The real question is human valuation and purpose in the face of robotic labor. The other question is the importance of communal safety when people are left in the economic gap between robotic automation and the requisite presence and participation of the human being for a market and for profit in the pockets of the Automating Industrialist and the government financing the same. Families, automation and basic income: Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a predictor of human behavior but if after all of the humble Gcse work and A level work, you can barely find a job in the world of automated labor, then if you do not have basic income, your hierarchy of needs is geared towards self preservation before you could ever think of starting a family yet you wanted to judge and accuse the current generations as not focusing on family while it would happen that if they had the basic income monies or oil community monies like other communities, they would focus on families and start families evidently. But, you cannot leave people in the gap caused by an absence of requisite basic income after a full socio-economic commitment to automated labor that includes automated cash registers, warehouse automation and robotic assembly and then expect them not to focus on self preservation as predicted by Maslow's hierarchy of need if you leave them in the gap Some pretend to be gay as they trade outside of the religious schism since most gay people respect the orphan urchin dialectic that centres on a community of survival; not on regeneration. They may have offered, some of them, to live until 40 years old and to enjoy life as best as they can since it is a fate commensurate to death and they reason that all of us must die sometimes so why not live in death? But, then after making the deal to live until 40 years old like the first group of students did on mass as born in 1976 and who also campaigned for gay marriage on the arrival of their death date, we see that there has been a depopulation in North America and then now dependence on immigration but with people who have no sense of rootedness while the argument for all of this is in the argument that this is what immigrants were willing to do who came to America during the industrial and they were quiet in suffering the death of a salesman while the American with ancestry dating back to 1776 and the declaration of independence entertained his rights, his history, his delusions of grandeur about the people but....they also did not think about how they could take their teeth and offer it to a gold smith to buy oranges to sell or to put a down payment on a building maybe but the immigrants were willing to offer their mother's gold. The purpose of the people may be quite evident to everyone. It is consumption; the trash compacting of all the .20 cent and $10.00 items coming off the assembly line; $10.00 items like the 32 inch television. All the stuff is trash really for compacting in the human life at some profitable margin in the calculation of human need so the human life is valuable as consumption in the calculation of profitable margins in the market made by basic income or market making income for consumption. Therefore, then all people are worthy of the finance given to refugees who come to the UK and some times the refugee has more grace in getting housing if he needed it than the average UK citizen but the refugee maybe is more exciting since someone still has to teach him how to say 'innit?' and how to be Anglo as someone all the way from Hyderabad but how can anyone be a refugee from Hyderabad or from Turkey these days? They know the value of human life as a market making widget in the basic income in the mass robotic Automation of labor. This is so and evident except to some people like the Anglo leader or Real maybe and what is the purpose of the Anglo if he is not valued around the world as a widget of consumption in the profit margins with basic income in the market making except but extermination according to Anglo political and economic leadership? We forgive the Anglo for not seeing this since we can see that he was bred to smoke cigarettes and eat certain sugars to kill himself faster than any other human being with gametes taken from the dead initially in 300 BC and who was bred as someone who would literally walk through this earth finding ways to enjoy life in killing himself softly; killing themselves softly. Now, if you had a leader like this with this dna, you would feel obliged to make them comfortable or is it do unto others as you would do unto yourself and this is kill your community softly; Selafield! A bag of oats has no complexion. A Toyota 4runner has no complexion.

The real question is human valuation and purpose in the face of robotic labor.  The other question is the importance of communal safety when people are left in the economic gap between robotic automation and the requisite  presence and participation of the human being for a market and for profit in the pockets of the Automating    Industrialist and  the government financing the same.     Families, automation and basic income: Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a predictor of human behavior but if after all of the humble Gcse work and A level work, you can barely find a job in the world of automated labor, then if you do not have basic income, your hierarchy of needs is geared towards self preservation before you could ever think of starting a family yet you wanted to judge and accuse the current generations as not focusing on family while it would happen that if they had the basic income monies or oil community monies like other communities, they would focus on families and start families evidently.     But, you cannot leave people in the gap caused by an absence of requisite basic income after a full socio-economic commitment to automated labor that includes automated cash registers, warehouse  automation and robotic assembly and then expect them not to focus on self preservation as predicted by Maslow's hierarchy of need if you leave them in the gap  Some pretend to be gay as they trade outside of the religious schism since most gay people respect the orphan urchin dialectic that centres on a community of survival; not on regeneration. They may have offered, some of them, to live until 40 years old and to enjoy life  as best as they can since it is a fate commensurate to death and they reason that all of us must die sometimes so why not live in death? But, then after making the deal to live until 40 years old like the first group of students did on mass as born in 1976 and who also campaigned for gay marriage on the arrival of their death date, we see that there has been a depopulation in North America and then now dependence on immigration but with people who have no sense of rootedness while the argument for all of this is in the argument that this is what immigrants were willing to do who came to America during the industrial and they were quiet in  suffering the death of a salesman while the American with ancestry dating back to 1776 and the  declaration of independence entertained his rights, his history, his delusions of grandeur about the people but....they also did not think about how they could take their teeth and offer it to a gold smith to buy oranges to sell or to put a down payment on a building maybe but the immigrants were willing to offer their mother's gold.  The purpose of the people may be quite evident to everyone. It is consumption;  the trash compacting of all the .20 cent  and $10.00 items  coming off the assembly line; $10.00 items like the 32 inch television.  All the stuff is trash really for compacting in the human life at some profitable margin in the calculation of human need so the human life is valuable as consumption in the calculation of profitable margins in the market made by basic income or market making income for consumption. Therefore, then all people are worthy of the finance given to refugees who come to the UK and some times the refugee has more grace in getting housing if he needed it than the average UK  citizen but the refugee maybe is more exciting since someone still has to teach him how to say 'innit?'  and how to be Anglo as someone all the way from Hyderabad but how can anyone be a refugee from Hyderabad or from Turkey these days? They know the value of human life as a market making widget in the basic income in the mass robotic Automation of labor.   This is so  and evident except to  some people like the Anglo leader or Real maybe and what is the purpose of the Anglo if he is not valued around the world as a widget of consumption  in the profit margins with basic income in the market  making except but extermination according to Anglo political and economic leadership?   We forgive the Anglo for not seeing this since we can see that he was bred to smoke cigarettes and eat certain sugars to kill himself faster than any other human being with gametes taken from the dead initially in 300 BC and who was bred as someone who would literally walk through this earth finding ways to enjoy life in killing himself softly; killing themselves softly. Now, if you had a leader like this with this dna, you would feel obliged to make them comfortable or is it do unto others as you would do unto yourself and this is kill your community softly; Selafield! A bag of oats has no complexion. A Toyota 4runner has no complexion.